Oregon SOS Administrative Recount Authority
I searched and searched to find the statute or regulation authorizing the SOS to conduct election audits and could not find anything. I gave up and sent an email to Anne Martens. It looks like he has the authority to order an administrative recount. It is unclear to me whether he could use this authority to call for a random sample audit.
Ginny, can you offer an opinion on this question?
Thanks!
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Anne M"
Date: June 7, 2005 2:31:06 PM PDT
To:
Subject: Re: Clarification of SOS election recount/audit authority
Betsy, it's Administrative Rule 165-007-0270:
165-007-0270
Administrative Recounts
(1) The purpose of this rule is to establish a procedure for the conduct of administrative recounts of selected ballots following an election conducted in this state. The Secretary of State, as the chief elections officer for the State of Oregon, has the responsibility to adopt rules that the Secretary considers necessary to facilitate and assist in achieving a maximum degree of correctness, impartiality and efficiency in administration of the election laws. This rule is intended to carry out that responsibility by providing a mechanism for selective recounts to confirm the accuracy of the automated vote tally systems used to count ballots.
(2) The Elections Division may, between the 20th and 23rd day after the election, direct the county elections official to conduct a recount of an office or measure, or portions of the votes cast for an office or
measure, as selected by the Division. Administrative recounts ordered under this subsection shall be directed only when unanticipated circumstances at the election put the accuracy of the vote tally equipment used in the county in question. Any such recount shall be conducted in accordance with applicable procedures in ORS Chapter 258 and as stated by the Division in the order directing the recount. All recounts conducted under this rule shall be conducted by hand. Administrative recounts of tally machines ordered under this subsection shall be limited to no more than 1,000 ballots in any one county. A Division order to conduct an administrative recount shall include a procedure for counties that process ballots by batch, rather than precinct. The procedure for "batch counties" shall avoid requiring the county to conduct an administrative recount of a specific precinct.
Counties that process ballots by hand will be required to conduct a hand count and a machine count of randomly selected ballots and compare the results. Notwithstanding ORS 258.161, 258.280 and 258.290, the cost of
conducting a recount under this rule shall be borne by the county in which the recount is conducted.
(3) Upon completion of the recount, and not later than 30 days after the election, the county elections official shall report on the results of the recount to the Division, together with any other information requested by the Division.
(4) A county elections official may choose to conduct an administrative recount of a selected office or measure and notify the Division of that decision in writing not later than the 23rd day after the election. In
this event, the Division will not direct the county to conduct an administrative recount under the procedures of this rule. If the county elections official chooses to conduct an administrative recount under this section, the results of the recount must be reported to the Division not later than the 30th day after the election.
(5) The procedures described in this rule may be implemented only if a county is not required to conduct either an automatic recount under ORS 258.280 and 258.290 or a partial or full demand recount under ORS 258.161. In the event that a recount under either of these procedures is commenced, any administrative recount is terminated.
(6) Recounts conducted under this rule shall not be used to alter the results obtained by the official tally of ballots, unless the procedures in ORS 258.161 are followed to make a demand for recount, either by a qualified person or the county elections official.
(7) For purposes of this rule, an "administrative recount" is a hand recount of selected offices or measures by hand to verify the accuracy of the vote tally equipment. It is not intended to provide a basis for changing the outcome of the results determined by the vote tally equipment, or to substitute for the procedures in state law for the conduct of automatic or demand recounts. Persons interested in challenging the vote tallies in particular races or measures must utilize the procedures in ORS 258.161 and 258.171 in order to have the
results of the recount become the official returns.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 246.150
Stats. Implemented: ORS 258.150
Hist.: ELECT 8-2004, f. & cert. ef. 10-29-04
Best,
Anne
Betsy Salter 6/6/2005 8:04:08 AM >>>
Hi Anne,
I have been trying to find the administrative rule or legislation that authorizes the Oregon SOS to conduct election recounts or to conduct an audit of election results. When Jerry, Nancy and I met with Mr. Bradbury last month, we thought we heard him say that the legislature recently passed a bill which gives him the authority to order an audit of election results. I wanted to verify that we heard him correctly by referring to the language of the statute or rule, but I'm not having any luck searching the SOS website or the Oregon State Legislature's website. Can you help me out or refer me to someone who can help me?
I'm thinking we misheard him because I recall the Marion County Elections Supervisor, Sharon Ricks, telling us that the legislature recently gave the SOS the authority to order a recount - but I can't find a statutory or regulatory reference for that authority either.
Thanks for your help!
Betsy



VIDEO: “Protecting Your Vote”




Beth H question, 6/8/05
On Jun 8, 2005, at 6:02 PM, Beth H wrote:
Did you see this? “Administrative recounts of tally machines ordered under this subsection
shall be limited to no more than 1,000 ballots in any one countyâ€
Jerry and Jan,
Does that give us enough to do what we want to do?
-----Original Message-----
From: Steering-bounces@oregonvrc.org [mailto:Steering-bounces@oregonvrc.org]On Behalf Of Betsy Salter
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 6:20 PM
To: Steering@OregonVRC.org
Subject: [Oregon VRC Steering] Fwd: Clarification of SOS electionrecount/audit authority
I searched and searched to find the statute or regulation authorizing the SOS to conduct election audits and could not find anything. I gave up and sent an email to Anne Martens. It looks like he has the authority to order an administrative recount. It is unclear to me whether he could use this authority to call for a random sample audit.
Please post comments to:
http://www.oregonvrc.org/node/389
Thanks,
Betsy
Jan's reply
On Jun 9, 2005, at 7:29 AM, Jan wrote:
No, not even close. Since this is an administrative rule, not a law, I'm hoping that Bradbury can get around this? He's trying out a new idea (the audit concept), and simply using his authority as SOS to do that?
Jan
----- Original Message -----
From: Beth H
To: Oregon VRC Steering
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 6:02 PM
Subject: RE: [Oregon VRC Steering] Fwd: Clarification of SOSelectionrecount/audit authority
Did you see this? “Administrative recounts of tally machines ordered under this subsection
shall be limited to no more than 1,000 ballots in any one countyâ€
Jerry and Jan,
Does that give us enough to do what we want to do?
Not a Recount for Results
The key thing I notice about this AR is that it applies strictly in the case of testing and other admin purposes, and not for any case involving a change in the result. Therefore, there is probably some leeway to construe his authority broadly to conduct the audit.